You want to know what I find kind of funny? Is that we talk about how SJW are bad because they are extreme, but not neccesarily because there policies are wrong. Maybe I’m wrong about this, but is this because SJW are more left leaning, therefore why do we have to be careful to what we say about them?
I could call conservatives cock juggling thunder cunts and I doubt I would be corrected on most forums. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying conservatives always need to be defended, nor am I saying that you should always explain yourself when you say something baseless and crass. What I don’t get is if I called liberals cock juggling thunder cunts, I always have to explain myself, like conservativism is flawed without explanation but liberalism is the better one so I have to explain why dislike the “superior” one. Well, I say liberalism is just as bad as conservatism and here are some points as to why.
Liberals will always agree and defend minorities 100%. Always.
Have you noticed that minorities will nearly always vote for liberals, but they themselves are obviously conservative? Like, liberals brag about how progressive they are with their gay rights, anti-bigotry and birth control, even though it is obvious most Blacks, Hispanics and Muslims do not agree with that at all. I mean, just look at the Muslims. I’m not saying all Muslims are like this, but some of the more radical ones make radical Christians look like Gandhi in comparison. Why are they constantly defending a group of people that are obviously more conservatives than there supposed opponent? Ben Shapiro said its because they both have the same goal of wiping out the evils of western civilization. I find that to be unfair and contrived, because the better answer is actually much stupider. The reason the left condones the actions and behaviors of minorities is because they want their votes, and they don’t care what they have to do to get it. Its like the left believes that as long as you cater to your voter block, even if it is obvious they don’t respect you or your views, then eventually they will see it your way and will agree with you. Even conservatives are not that stupid, as they make sure that their voters at least agree with their views. “Vote republican, but make sure you disagree with a raise in the minimum wage because that will raise your taxes.” In politics, your supposed to make sure that your voters agree with your views, that’s politics 101. All the left are doing is not different than spoiling a child; yeah, you’re child gets what they want, but that does not mean that respect your authority or agree with you. It creates a worse mentality, and can often damage that person or group in the long run if your keep agreeing with their views when they contradict your own. I would say the left are being naïve, but it sounds more like arrogance, thinking that eventually they will see it your way without actually explaining to them what they want them to do.
It does not just extend to politics it extends to media to. For instance, black people are right or usually in the higher pecking order than whites. What are some stereotypes for blacks? Well, there good at sports, are good at sex and can dance, which are qualities that white people do not have. Well, those are the positives for black people, what are the negatives? They like fried chicken and watermelon. That’s not a negative, that’s neutral at best because nearly every culture loves fried chicken and watermelon. Its normal food to like. Black people have hardly any negative sterotypes that is their own and come out looking like the ubermench. You’re not making fun of someone if all your saying is complements about them. Hell, its getting so bad that even things that are not considered compliments are written off as positives. I keep on hearing about how Mexicans are amazing for doing basic manual labor. C’mon, its basic manual labor, what retard cant even do that? Even a child will roll their eyes if someone treats that as a good thing. Excelling at mediocrity is not something worthy of praise, and if that is the best compliment you can give to that culture, why the hell are you not helping that culture?
Liberals think conservatives are stupid, when the opposite is true.
This one pisses me off, not because I like conservatives, but because so many problems with politics could be fixed if the left respected their enemies intelligence. I always hear that conservatives are dumber than liberals, based on how stuff they say and how many liberals are in college compared to conservatives. (Even though college is mostly frivolous and is actually a bad investment.) So, I have a question for the Left; if conservatives are so stupid, why do they own nearly all the big businesses? Oil, automobiles, agriculture, industry etc. have a firm grip from the right. Sure, the left has unions and universities, but that pales in comparison to the rights ownership of corportations, which has more influence around the globe. It makes sense if you think about the usual mentality of the right; they are introverts who care about making a profit and don’t care how they get it done. A job just cares about achieving profit, not if you like doing it or not, so it makes sense that someone as indifferent as a conservative would be good at making money. The major problem is Liberals do not understand that mentality, and just call them stupid and xenophobic, when the problem is that conservative are not stupid or xenophobic, considering that they are the ones providing jobs for illegal immigrants.
I remember someone saying on this forum that 70% of Muslims Immigrants are men coming to Europe. That does not surprise me as Europe is one of those aging nations that are looking for cheap manual labor. I think the occasional immigrations is a good thing, providing that the ones coming into the country are documented and there should be a limit per year how many are coming. The problem is that there is a flood of immigrants coming in not because they are hard to control, but because industry wants cheap labor. If too many people come in, there wont be as much demand for labor, so companies can pay cheaper wages to laborers, as they are more expendable. And with the flood of immigrants coming in, the wages can be kept at a constant low. That’s not a conspiracy theory, that business 101. What helps is liberals are calling racism to the act and thinking that it is damaging conservatives. Ignoring that the European Union are a bunch of sovereign nations and can actually decide who they want into their country, liberals are just doing a favor for the conservatives. With no one controlling the wave of immigration, conservatives, who pretty much own industry, can make a profit from exploiting both the immigrants and the Europeans. And if Europe goes to hell, fuck it, the industries will just move their operations to third world nations, like what they did in the United States. The conservatives are not losing, there winning, exploiting the lefts desire to take care of everyone but their own people. Multiculturalism isn’t a liberal idea, it’s a conservative one, because its easier to make a buck off of someone if they all believe in the same ideas.
One a side not, is the any nation out there other then white ones that believe in multiculturalism? You may call it racism, but I believe cultures have a right to separate if they choose, be they Black, White, Asian etc. Variety is the spice of life.
Liberals even fail to understand what they have interests in I think its pretty asinine that there are still a lot of fundamentalists not wanting to teach evolution in school. What is even crazier is it would be so easy just for the fundamentalist to say god created evolution and let that be the end of that. However, while I think fundamentalists are bad at science, I would still trust their scientific knowledge over a liberals. Two pre-faces:
a. While it is annoying that fundies do not believe in evolution, I at least understand their refusal. Evolution is not something you can observe. Its not Pokemon, Evolution is something that happens in the past tense, so people, especially children, would have a hard time believing in something that they cant see. Global Warming is the same but in a future tense, and that’s even trickier because that’s not looking at the past for answers, that guessing what will happen in the future, and people can easily fuck up that. For all the faults fundies have, at least they agree with present tense science. Like, you will not find too many conservatives disagreeing that whales are mammals as they produce milk and give out live young. Even the more hard core fundie could agree with that scientific fact.
b. I find that the definition of a first world problem is plastic surgery. I’m not saying everyone who has plastic surgery is stupid, sometimes the surgery themselves can fix physical mistakes, like adjusting your nose so that it looks nicer and you can breath better. Even if it is just purely for cosmetic, I don’t have a problem with if the changes are subtle enough. My problem is when people go extreme with it, like people who try to look exactly like Barbie or Mat Damon is when it becomes a problem, as you are trying to become someone you are not. I think its fair to say the more extreme you go with plastic surgery, the more shallow it becomes.
Well I think we can agree with what I am saying, lets talk about human anatomy and transsexuals! Yeah, for all the faults the fundies have, at least they don’t disagree with stuff on a present tense level. Yeah, they may take out their kids for sex eds in school, but at least its on the grounds that they think their kids are too young to learn about that stuff. At least its not the liberal refusal of “How dare you hurt the feelings of those who cant help but feel that their the opposite sex!” 1. feelings are not facts and 2. You have to actually learn about the opposite sex in order to know that there is an opposite sex, so it does not have a biological drive in it at all. You libtards. Normally, I’m okay with people butchering themselves as long as it dosent affect me. My problem is that liberals are saying that transgender is scientific, when Liberals also say that sexuality is a social construct. Well, which is it? You can’t have it both ways, but I prefer the social construct one because it allows us to have choices.Another problem I have is supporting this tranny stuff is more damaging than helpful. Even after surgery, trannies still have a 50% suicide rate. Now, I’m not one for statistic; they have their place, but the only time people use stats is want to win an argument, so they will cherry pick the ones that support their views. No, I didn’t use the stats for the sake of winning an argument, I choose the stat because no one should be surprised by the high suicide rate. By that I mean YOU CUT OFF YOUR JUNK FOR A SHALLOW REPRESENTATION OF FAKE GENTILLA WHILE SPEED BALLING HORMONES AND VARIOUS OTHER DRUGS, WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK THAT IS GOING TO DO TO YOUR BIOLOGICAL SYSTEM! You don’t think someone going to be kind of fucked up mentally from that? Even tweekers can tell that mixing hard core drugs is going to fuck up the trannies brain and body. It messes up your brain, it shortens your life span, it makes your life miserable, so why, all because you couldn’t admit defeat on a shallow level? You can call me a monster, but if Kurt Cobain mother can call his suicide stupid, why cant I call a trannies obvious, hollow and self inflicting ‘tragedy’ stupid too? But what’s really horrible is when they commit suicide, Liberals say “we are all to blame, (especially the conservatives who made fun of them.)” No! It was yore fault in turning these people in a Frankenstein monster! If you ask me, trannies commit suicide because they realize what they did was stupid, but Liberals will say that they made the right choice because they don’t want to admit that their wrong! I know all Liberals are not like this, but why support an obviously monstrous act?